Key legal question
Whether the appeal against the cantonal interlocutory decision was admissible under Art. 93 BGG
Extracted holding
The cantonal decision was an interlocutory decision; neither a non-reparable prejudice nor a substantial saving of time or costs was shown.
Extracted reasoning
The challenged ruling only prolonged the proceedings and did not end them. The appellant did not substantiate any irreparable disadvantage, and the conditions for immediate review under Art. 93(1) BGG were not met.