Key legal question
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Extracted holding
No. The appeal did not explain sufficiently why the cantonal judgment was unlawful or why the factual findings were manifestly incorrect.
Extracted reasoning
The filing mainly restated the procedural history, criticized a final decision, described medical and personal circumstances, and expressed wishes for benefits; this did not satisfy Art. 42 paras. 1-2 LTF.