The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
ATA/376/1998•Revision and interpretation requests declared inadmissible
ATA/376/1998Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberJun 16, 1998Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The applicant filed requests for revision and interpretation concerning an administrative decision. The tribunal held that the revision request was inadmissible because no revision ground was alleged, and that the interpretation request was also inadmissible. It further held that the applicant was not entitled to a procedural indemnity despite partial success, in particular because no court fee was levied. The outcome reflects the tribunal's broad discretion on procedural compensation.
LPA art. 80; revision and interpretation remedies are inadmissible absent a cognizable statutory ground or an actual interpretative need. Procedural compensation is governed by the tribunal's broad discretion; there is no general entitlement to an indemnity where the appeal is only partly successful, especially if no judicial fee is charged.
Descripteurs
PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; REVISION(DECISION); INTERPRETATION(SENS GENERAL); OPPOSITION(PROCEDURE); EMOLUMENT DE JUSTICE; INDEMNITE(EN GENERAL); PROC
Normes
LPA.80
Résumé
Révision déclarée irrecevable, aucun motif de révision n'étant allégué. Un recourant qui obtient partiellement gain de cause peut ne pas se voir allouer l'indemnité, ce d'autant si aucun émolument ne lui est infligé. Demande en interprétation déclarée irrecevable. L'octroi d'une indemnité de procédure est soumis au large pouvoir d'appréciation du Tribunal administratif et il n'existe aucun droit à une indemnité en cas d'admission partielle d'un recours.
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the request for revision was admissible.
The revision request was inadmissible because no ground for revision was alleged.
A revision procedure requires at least one legally cognizable ground to be invoked; none was stated here.
Whether the request for interpretation was admissible.
The request for interpretation was inadmissible.
The decision did not disclose an interpretative defect justifying the remedy.
Whether procedural compensation had to be awarded after partial success on appeal.
No procedural indemnity had to be awarded, especially since no court fee was imposed.
The award of procedural compensation lies within the Administrative Tribunal's broad discretion, and there is no entitlement to such compensation merely because the appeal succeeds only in part.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.