Dental costs from autoimmune disease not covered by compulsory insurance

ATA/54/1997Court of Justice / Administrative ChamberJan 21, 1997Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The dispute concerned whether dental expenses caused by an autoimmune disease had to be reimbursed by compulsory health insurers. The court held that, under the applicable health insurance statute, such dental costs are not covered merely because the underlying condition is autoimmune. The claim for reimbursement was therefore rejected.

Omnilex headnote

LAMA art. 12; compulsory health insurance coverage for dental treatment costs caused by an autoimmune disease. Dental treatment expenses are not covered merely because they stem from an autoimmune disorder; coverage requires a statutory basis extending the benefit to such treatment, which is absent here.

Full text

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; AFFECTION DENTAIRE; PRINCIPE DE LA BONNE FOI; TRAITEMENT DENTAIRE; ASSU

Normes

LAMA.12

Résumé

En application de la LAMA, les frais dentaires engendrés par une maladie auto-immune ne doivent pas êtrte pris en charge par les caisses-maladie.

Keywords

social insurancehealth insurancedental treatmentautoimmune diseasecoveragegood faith

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether dental treatment costs caused by an autoimmune disease are covered by compulsory health insurance.

Extracted holding

Such dental costs are not to be borne by the health insurer under the applicable compulsory health insurance rules.

Extracted reasoning

The court held that the causal link to an autoimmune disease does not, by itself, make the dental treatment a covered benefit under the compulsory insurance scheme.

Key legal question

Whether the insured person could rely on good faith to obtain coverage.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.