The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Complaint struck out as moot in lien sale proceeding

15.1995.40Other CourtFeb 20, 1995Other

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

A complaint was filed against the Locarno debt enforcement office's preparation of the lien list in an immovable-property realization. Before the supervisory court decided the matter, the complainant informed the office that the complaint was moot and that the auction scheduled for 9 September 1994 could proceed. The Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti therefore struck the complaint from the docket and ordered that no costs or indemnities be taken or awarded.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 67 cpv. 2 and 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF; complaint becomes moot during pending supervisory proceedings: where the complainant itself acknowledges that the challenged measure no longer has object and the scheduled execution step may proceed, the supervisory authority shall strike the complaint from the roll without deciding the merits; in such circumstances, no court costs or indemnities are ordinarily awarded.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 15.1995.40

Data decisione, Autorità: 20.02.1995, CEF

Incarto n. 15.95.00040

Lugano 20 febbraio 1995

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici:

Flavio Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretario:

Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

visto il reclamo 1. settembre 1994 di

rappr. da__________

contro

l’operato dell’ Ufficio e fallimenti di Locarno, e meglio contro l'allestimento dell'elenco oneri nell'ambito della procedura di realizzazione del pegno immobiliare (part. __________ RFD di __________) nell'esecuzione n. __________ PI promossa dalla reclamante contro

preso atto dello scritto 8 settembre 1994 con il quale l’__________ aveva comunicato all’UEF di Locarno di ritenere il reclamo privo d’oggetto, per cui la vendita all’incanto, già indetta per il 9 settembre 1994, poteva essere regolarmente eseguita;

richiamati gli art. 67 cpv. 2 e 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF;

PRONUNCIA

  1. Il reclamo 1. settembre 1994 dell’__________, è stralciato dai ruoli nel senso dei considerandi.

  2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

  3. Intimazione:

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

debt enforcementlien listimmovable propertymootnesssupervisory complaintcosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the supervisory complaint against the lien list should still be examined after the complainant declared it moot.

Extracted holding

The complaint was struck from the docket because it had become moot.

Extracted reasoning

After the complainant's own statement that the complaint was without object and the scheduled auction could lawfully proceed, there was no live dispute left to decide.

Key legal question

Whether court fees or compensation should be awarded.

Extracted holding

No fees were charged and no compensation was awarded.

Extracted reasoning

The court saw no basis to allocate costs in the circumstances of a complaint that was removed from the docket as moot.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.