Appeal struck out after withdrawal; costs on appellant

52.1995.242Other CourtFeb 15, 1996Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Ticino Administrative Court dealt with an appeal against a State Council decision on a parish tax of CHF 7 for 1989. After the parish communicated that it was withdrawing its appeals, the court struck the case from the docket. It held that the withdrawal should be treated as loss for purposes of compensation. Accordingly, no court fees or expenses were charged, but the appellant had to pay CHF 100 in party compensation to the respondent.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 60-61 PAmm; withdrawal of an administrative appeal and costs consequences; where the appellant withdraws the appeal, the proceedings are struck out and the withdrawal is assimilated to defeat for the allocation of party compensation, while court fees may be waived depending on the circumstances. The decisive factor is the procedural termination by desistance, which bars a merits ruling and shifts the question to costs only (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1995.242

Data decisione, Autorità: 15.02.1996, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.95.00242 leo

Lugano 15 febbraio 1996

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della


rappr. da: avv. __________

contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2846) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per l'anno 1989 di fr. 7.--;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;

visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,

dichiara e pronuncia:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciata dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 100.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.

  4. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

parish taxwithdrawalstruck outparty compensationcourt costsadministrative appeal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be struck from the docket after the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted holding

The appeal was struck out after the withdrawal declaration.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal communicated on 17 January 1996 and treated it as ending the proceedings.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs and party compensation after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No court fees or expenses were charged, but the appellant had to pay the respondent CHF 100 as compensation.

Extracted reasoning

The court assimilated the withdrawal to defeat for the purpose of deciding compensation.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.