Appeal struck out after withdrawal; costs on withdrawing party

52.1995.304Other CourtFeb 15, 1996Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In a parish tax dispute concerning CHF 588 for 1989/90, the appellant parish informed the Administrative Court that it was withdrawing its appeals following legislative changes. The court therefore struck the appeal from the docket. It held that the withdrawal counts as defeat for the purpose of party costs, ordered the appellant to pay CHF 200 to the respondent, and decided that no court fees or expenses would be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 273 vLT; Art. 60-61 PAmm: withdrawal of an administrative appeal; cost consequences. If the appellant withdraws the appeal, the proceedings are struck out. For the allocation of party costs, the withdrawal is assimilated to defeat. In the absence of special circumstances, no court fees or expenses are levied, while party costs may be awarded to the successful opposing party (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1995.304

Data decisione, Autorità: 15.02.1996, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.95.00304 leo

Lugano 15 febbraio 1996

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 3 maggio 1991 della


rappr. da: avv. __________

contro

la decisione 9 aprile 1991 (n. 2912) del Consiglio di Stato che accoglie l'impugnativa presentata dalla __________;

avverso la risoluzione del Consiglio parrocchiale di __________ relativa al prelievo di un'imposta parrocchiale per gli anni 1989/90 per complessivi fr. 588.--;

vista la risposta inoltrata dalla parte resistente sopra menzionata;

preso atto della replica e della duplica;

preso atto della comunicazione 17 gennaio 1996 con cui la Parrocchia di __________, richiamate le modifiche legislative intervenute nel frattempo, dichiara di recedere dalle impugnative;

assimilata la desistenza alla soccombenza ai fini del giudizio sulle ripetibili;

visti gli art. 273 vLT; 8, 12, 28 TOA; 3, 18, 28, 31, 60, 61 PAmm,

dichiara e pronuncia:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 200.-- alla resistente a titolo di ripetibili.

  4. Intimazione a:


Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalparty costsstriking outparish taxadministrative appeal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should remain pending after the appellant's withdrawal

Extracted holding

The appeal was removed from the docket because the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the written notice of 17 January 1996 by which the parish withdrew the challenges, and it treated the withdrawal as terminating the proceedings.

Key legal question

How costs should be allocated after withdrawal

Extracted holding

No court fees or expenses were charged, but the appellant had to pay CHF 200 in party costs to the respondent.

Extracted reasoning

The court assimilated the withdrawal to defeat for the purpose of deciding party costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.