Appeal struck off after withdrawal in building permit case

52.1995.74Other CourtApr 6, 1995Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant withdrew its appeal against the State Council's 17 January 1995 building-permit decision. The Administrative Court therefore terminated the proceedings and struck the appeal from the docket. It ordered no court fees or expenses, but awarded the respondents CHF 800 in party compensation.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of appeal; termination of proceedings; costs and party compensation. When the appellant withdraws the appeal, the court strikes the case from the docket because the dispute is exhausted. In such a situation the court may waive court fees and expenses, while allocating party compensation to the prevailing respondents according to the procedural outcome (consid. 1-3).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1995.74

Data decisione, Autorità: 06.04.1995, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.95.00074 DP 44/95 leo

Lugano 6 aprile 1995

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna e Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso del 3 febbraio 1995 di


rappr. da: __________

contro

la decisione 17 gennaio 1995 del Consiglio di Stato (n. 332) in materia di licenza edilizia;

preso atto che in data 24 marzo 1995 la ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. La ricorrente rifonderà fr. 800.-- (ottocento) a titolo di ripetibili ai resistenti __________ e __________.

Intimazione a:

__________;

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo:

Il presidente: Il segretario:

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalappealbuilding permitcostsparty compensationproceedings terminated

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should remain pending after the appellant withdrew it.

Extracted holding

The proceedings were exhausted by the withdrawal, so the appeal was struck off the docket.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appellant communicated the withdrawal, there was no longer a live dispute for the court to decide.

Key legal question

How costs and party compensation should be allocated after the withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were charged, but the appellant had to pay CHF 800 in party compensation to the respondents.

Extracted reasoning

Because the case ended through withdrawal, the court ordered no fees or expenses, while awarding respondents their costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.