Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the roll

52.1996.238Other CourtMar 14, 1997Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged the State Council's decision confirming the municipality's termination of his employment relationship. Before the administrative court ruled on the merits, the appellant's lawyer notified the court that the appeal was being withdrawn. The court therefore struck the case from the roll and ordered that no court fees or expenses be levied.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the appeal before judgment; the proceedings are terminated and the case is struck from the roll. In the absence of a merits decision, the court may simply take note of the withdrawal and, depending on the circumstances, refrain from charging fees and expenses (consid. not specified).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.1996.238

Data decisione, Autorità: 14.03.1997, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.96.00238

Lugano 14 marzo 1997

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

composto dei giudici:

Lorenzo Anastasi, presidente, Raffaello Balerna, Stefano Bernasconi

segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 4 novembre 1996 di


patrocinato da: avv. __________

contro

la decisione 16 ottobre 1996, no. 5240, del Consiglio di Stato che respinge l'impugnaiva presentata dall'insorgente avverso la risoluzione 18 luglio 1996 con cui il municipio di __________ ha disdetto il suo rapporto di impiego;

preso atto che in data 3 marzo 1997 il patrocinatore del ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

Per il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalstrike from rolladministrative appealemployment relationshipcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be continued after the appellant's withdrawal

Extracted holding

The proceedings were terminated because the appeal had been withdrawn.

Extracted reasoning

Counsel informed the court on 1997-03-03 that the appellant was withdrawing the appeal; the procedure was therefore exhausted.

Key legal question

Allocation of court fees and expenses after withdrawal

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were charged.

Extracted reasoning

Given the withdrawal and termination of the proceedings, the court ordered no fees or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.