Appeal withdrawn and struck out from the roll

52.2004.312Other CourtSep 22, 2004Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged a municipal award of synthetic surfacing works before the Ticino cantonal administrative court. After filing the appeal on 16 September 2004, the appellant informed the court on 22 September 2004 that it was withdrawing the appeal. The court therefore held that the proceedings were exhausted, struck the appeal from the roll, and ordered that no fees or costs be collected.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an appeal before the cantonal administrative court renders the proceedings moot and justifies striking the case from the roll; in such a situation, the court may order that no judicial fees or costs be charged.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 52.2004.312

Data decisione, Autorità: 22.09.2004, TRAM

Incarto n. 52.2004.312

Lugano 22 settembre 2004

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Lorenzo Anastasi

assistito dal segretario:

Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 16 settembre 2004 della

RI1

contro

la decisione 16 settembre 2004 del Comune di __________, che delibera i lavori per ammantature sintetiche al consorzio __________ e __________;

preso atto che il 22 settembre 2004 la ricorrente ha comunicato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

.

terzi implicati

Il presidente del Tribunale cantonale amministrativo

Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

appeal withdrawalstruck outcourt costsadministrative proceedingsmunicipal award

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be dismissed following the appellant's withdrawal.

Extracted holding

The court struck the appeal from the roll because the appellant withdrew it, so the proceedings were exhausted.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appellant communicated withdrawal, there was no remaining dispute for the court to decide.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the proceedings ended through withdrawal, the court ordered no costs or fees.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.