Appeal withdrawn; case struck from the list

90.1997.33Other CourtFeb 26, 2003Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellants challenged the State Council's approval of a zoning-plan amendment concerning buildings outside building zones. Before the merits were decided, their representative informed the court that the appeal was withdrawn. The Territorial Planning Court therefore struck the appeal from the docket and ordered that no fees or costs be charged.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an administrative appeal; the court strikes the matter from the rolls without examining the merits. In the absence of a continued dispute, the proceeding is terminated by procedural order. Where the court so provides, no court fees or expenses are charged; the dispositive order reflects only the procedural discontinuance and the ancillary cost allocation.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 90.1997.33

Data decisione, Autorità: 26.02.2003, TPT

Incarto n. 90.1997.33

Lugano 26 febbraio 2003

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario

Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 aprile 1997 di

__________ e __________ __________, __________


rappr. da: studio legale __________, __________


contro

la decisione 12 marzo 1997 (n. __________) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha approvato la variante del piano regolatore del comune di __________ concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili;

preso atto che, con lettera 24 febbraio 2003, il rappresentante dei ricorrenti ha comunicato al Tribunale di ritirare l’impugnativa;

decreta

  1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2.Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

  1. Intimazione a:

Il presidente del Il segretario

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

planningappeal withdrawalstrike offcostszoning planprocedural termination

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be dismissed from the docket after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

Yes. Because the appellants withdrew the appeal, the court struck the case from the rolls.

Extracted reasoning

The court noted the withdrawal communicated by the appellants' representative and therefore discontinued the appeal proceedings without further examination of the merits.

Key legal question

How court fees and expenses should be allocated after withdrawal.

Extracted holding

No taxes or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Following the withdrawal, the court ordered that no court fees or expenses be collected.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.