Appeal withdrawn; case struck out as moot

90.1997.63Other CourtOct 8, 1997Withdrawn

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant appealed against a 7 May 1997 State Council resolution approving an amendment to a municipal zoning plan. Before the court ruled on the merits, the appellant informed the court on 6 October 1997 that it was withdrawing the appeal. The Tribunal therefore held that the case had become moot, struck the appeal from the docket, and decided that no fees or costs would be charged.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of the appeal renders the matter moot; in the absence of a live dispute, the court strikes the case from the docket. Where the proceeding ends in this manner, and absent contrary circumstances, no court fees or expenses are levied (consid. implicit).

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 90.1997.63

Data decisione, Autorità: 08.10.1997, TPT

Incarto n. 90.97.00063

Lugano 8 ottobre 1997

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici:

Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario

Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 11 giugno 1997 di

__________ __________, __________,

contro

la risoluzione 7 maggio 1997 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variate di Piano Regolatore (Sezione __________) del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 ottobre 1997 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

  1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

  3. Intimazione a:


  • Municipio di __________

  • Consiglio di Stato,


  • Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

planningwithdrawalmootnessstrike-offcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should be maintained after the appellant's withdrawal

Extracted holding

The appeal had become moot and was struck off the docket.

Extracted reasoning

By letter of 6 October 1997 the appellant declared the withdrawal of the challenge; no live controversy remained.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Given the withdrawal and the mootness of the case, the court ordered no fees or expenses.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.