The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Appeal withdrawn; case struck out as moot

90.1997.79Other CourtDec 15, 1997Withdrawn

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The appellant challenged the State Council's approval of a planning variant concerning the inventory of buildings outside buildable zones in the municipality. At the hearing on 12 December 1997, the appellant withdrew the appeal. The Territorial Planning Court therefore struck the case from the docket as moot and ordered that no fees or costs be collected.

Omnilex headnote

Withdrawal of an appeal renders the proceedings moot and justifies striking the case from the docket; in such circumstances the court may dispense with the levying of judicial fees and costs.

Full text

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 90.1997.79

Data decisione, Autorità: 15.12.1997, TPT

Incarto n. 90.97.00079

Lugano 15 dicembre 1997

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici:

Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario

Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 14 luglio 1997 di

__________ __________, __________,

contro

la risoluzione 10 giugno 1997 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva la variante di Piano Regolatore concernente l'inventario degli edifici situati fuori dalle zone edificabili del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 20 novembre 1997 del Consiglio di Stato e 17 settembre 1997 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all'udienza del 12 dicembre 1997 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

  1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

  2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

  3. Intimazione a:

  • Municipio di ______

  • Consiglio di Stato,

  • Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Keywords

withdrawalmootnessstriking outplanning appealcourt costs

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the appeal should remain pending after the appellant withdrew it at the hearing.

Extracted holding

The appeal was struck from the docket because the appellant withdrew the challenge and the case had become moot.

Extracted reasoning

Once the appeal was withdrawn, there was no longer a live controversy to decide.

Key legal question

Whether court fees and costs should be charged.

Extracted holding

No court fees or costs were levied.

Extracted reasoning

Because the case was removed from the docket after withdrawal, the court dispensed with costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.