Whether the investigation costs charged to the appellant should be reduced because of his alleged financial hardship
The costs were not to be reduced; the calculation of emoluments and disbursements was correct and no basis existed for a reduction under the tariff rules.
The emoluments were correctly calculated from the number of pages, and the disbursements were justified by police intervention and alcohol test expenses. The appellant's prior violence-related cases meant he could not ignore litigation costs, and the case circumstances did not justify a reduction.