Reminder against refusal of legal aid

16 AR 6/06Court of First InstanceMay 24, 2006OtherDismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The applicant filed a reminder on 31 January 2006 against the registrar’s 23 January 2006 refusal to grant requested legal advice assistance (case 5 UR II 183/05). The District Court of Aachen held that the reminder was admissible under § 6(2) BerHG but unfounded, and rejected it. The refusal therefore remained in effect.

Omnilex headnote

§ 6(2) BerHG; the statutory reminder against refusal of legal advice assistance is admissible where the procedural requirements are met. On the merits, the reminder must be rejected if the refusal is not shown to be incorrect. No further general legal principle or reasoning is stated in the decision text provided.

Full text

Amtsgericht Aachen — 16 AR 6/06 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-05-24

Aktenzeichen: 16 AR 6/06

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2006:0524.16AR6.06.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Einzelrichter

Tenor

In der Beratungshilfesache

wird die gemäß § 6 Abs. 2 BerHG zulässige Erinnerung des Antragstellers vom 31. 1. 2006 gegen den die Bewilligung der beantragten Beratungshilfe verweigernden Be-schluss der Rechtspflegerin vom 23. 1. 2006 – 5 UR II 183/05 –als nicht begründet verworfen.

Keywords

legal advice assistancereminderadmissibilitymerits review

The reminder is admissible but unfounded; the refusal of legal advice assistance stands.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.