Supplementation of an asset disclosure in enforcement proceedings

6 M 1250/17Court of First InstanceNov 23, 2017Debt enforcement and bankruptcy lawGranted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The debtor filed an objection on 9 October 2017 concerning the creditor’s request to supplement or repeat an asset disclosure made on 17 March 2017. The Ahaus Local Court directed the senior enforcement officer identified as K not to comply with the request and to discontinue further enforcement in that respect. The creditor was ordered to bear the court’s expenses and the out-of-court costs; no court fees are payable. The value of the proceedings was fixed at EUR 5,000.

Full text

Amtsgericht Ahaus — 6 M 1250/17 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-11-23

Aktenzeichen: 6 M 1250/17

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAH:2017:1123.6M1250.17.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Amtsgericht

Tenor

wird der Obergerichtsvollzieher K auf die Erinnerung des Schuldners vom 09.10.2017 hin angewiesen, dem Antrag der Gläubigerin vom 07.09./17.11.2017 auf Nachbesserung/erneute Abgabe der Vermögensauskunft vom 17.03.2017 nicht nachzukommen und die weitere Zwangsvollstreckung insoweit einzustellen.

Gerichtskosten fallen nicht an. Die Auslagen des Gerichts und die außergerichtlichen Kosten trägt die Gläubigerin.

Der Verfahrenswert wird auf 5.000 Euro festgesetzt.

Keywords

asset disclosureenforcement proceedingsdebtor objectioncost allocation

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Whether the enforcement officer should comply with the creditor’s request to supplement or obtain a renewed asset disclosure.

The enforcement officer must not comply with the request and must discontinue further enforcement to that extent.

Allocation of court expenses and the creditor’s out-of-court costs.

No court fees are payable; the creditor bears the court’s expenses and the parties’ out-of-court costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.