Criminal charge of incitement to hatred in concurrence with insult
The accused was guilty of incitement to hatred in concurrence with insult.
39 Ds - 216 Js 396/16 - 1027/17•Incitement to hatred and insult
Incitement to hatred and insultAI generated
39 Ds - 216 Js 396/16 - 1027/17Court of First InstanceFeb 22, 2018Criminal lawConvicted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The Bielefeld District Court convicted X. of incitement to hatred in concurrence with insult. It imposed a six-month prison sentence and ordered X. to bear the costs of the proceedings, including his own expenses. The judgment cites §§ 130 I Nr. 1, 185, 194 and 52 StGB as the applicable provisions.
Full text
Amtsgericht Bielefeld — 39 Ds - 216 Js 396/16 - 1027/17 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2018-02-22
Aktenzeichen: 39 Ds - 216 Js 396/16 - 1027/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBI:2018:0222.39DS216JS396.16.1.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Strafrichter
Tenor
In der Strafsache gegen X. wird der Angeklagte wegen Volksverhetzung in Tateinheit mit Beleidigung zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von sechs Monaten verurteilt.
Der Angeklagte hat die Kosten des Verfahrens einschließlich seiner Auslagen zu tragen.
Angewendete Vorschriften:
§§ 130 I Nr. 1, 185, 194, 52 StGB
Keywords
incitement to hatredinsultconcurrence of offencesimprisonmentcriminal costs
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings
The accused must bear the costs of the proceedings, including his expenses.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.