Whether to establish a guardianship for the purpose of asserting rights against the attorney-in-fact.
The requested guardianship was not established.
2 XVII 453/18 B•Appointment of a guardian to assert rights against an attorney-in-fact
Appointment of a guardian to assert rights against an attorney-in-factAI generated
2 XVII 453/18 BCourt of First InstanceMay 22, 2019Family lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
In guardianship proceedings concerning I. C., the Bielefeld District Court refused to establish a guardianship limited to asserting rights against the attorney-in-fact. The court ordered that no court costs be collected and that extrajudicial costs not be reimbursed. The decision provides no further factual background or reasoning.
Full text
Amtsgericht Bielefeld — 2 XVII 453/18 B — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2019-05-22
Aktenzeichen: 2 XVII 453/18 B
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBI:2019:0522.2XVII453.18B.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Betreuungsgericht
Tenor
In dem betreuungsgerichtlichen Verfahren für Herrn I. C. wird die Einrichtung einer Betreuung mit dem Aufgabenkreis "Geltendmachung von Rechten gegenüber der Bevollmächtigten" abgelehnt.
Von einer Erhebung der Kosten wird abgesehen. Die außergerichtlichen Kosten werden nicht erstattet.
Keywords
adult guardianshipattorney-in-factcosts
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of court and extrajudicial costs.
No court costs were collected, and extrajudicial costs were not reimbursed.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.