Denial of the debtor’s application for discharge of residual debt

97 IN 79/02Court of First InstanceNov 11, 2005Insolvency lawDismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

Bonn Local Court denied the debtor’s application for discharge of residual debt. The order also allocates the costs of the discharge proceeding to the debtor, while making the applicant who sought denial primarily liable for court costs in relation to the state treasury. The decision cites InsO § 290(1) No. 5 as its statutory basis.

Omnilex headnote

Under InsO § 290(1) No. 5, discharge of residual debt may be denied on the statutory ground specified in that provision. The disposition must separately address the costs of the proceeding on the discharge application and the liability for court costs vis-à-vis the state treasury. In this case, the debtor was charged with the proceeding costs, while the applicant seeking denial was made primarily liable for court costs in the relationship with the treasury.

Full text

Amtsgericht Bonn — 97 IN 79/02 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2005-11-11

Aktenzeichen: 97 IN 79/02

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2005:1111.97IN79.02.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 97. Insolvenzabteilung

Normen: InsO § 290 Abs. 1 Nr. 5

Tenor

wird dem Schuldner die beantragte Restschuldbefreiung versagt.

Die Kosten des Verfahrens über den Antrag auf Restschuldbefreiung trägt der Schuldner; für die Gerichtskosten haftet jedoch im Verhältnis zur Staatskasse vorrangig der Versagungsantragsteller.

Keywords

insolvencydischarge of residual debtdenial of dischargeprocedural costs

The requested discharge of residual debt is denied.

The debtor bears the proceeding costs; the denial applicant is primarily liable for court costs vis-à-vis the state treasury.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.