Denial of residual debt discharge

98 IK 285/04Court of First InstanceJan 22, 2009Insolvency lawDismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Bonn District Court denied the debtor's application for residual debt discharge. It ordered the debtor to bear the costs of the discharge proceeding, while providing that the applicant seeking denial of discharge is primarily liable for court costs vis-à-vis the state. The order cites section 290(1), no. 5, of the German Insolvency Code. The decision states no further factual background or reasons.

Full text

Amtsgericht Bonn — 98 IK 285/04 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2009-01-22

Aktenzeichen: 98 IK 285/04

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2009:0122.98IK285.04.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: 98. Insolvenzabteilung

Normen: Inso § 290 Abs. 1 Nr.5

Tenor

wird dem Schuldner die beantragte Restschuldbefreiung versagt.

Die Kosten des Verfahrens über den Antrag auf Restschuldbefreiung trägt der Schuldner; für die Gerichtskosten haftet jedoch im Verhältnis zur Staatskasse vorrangig der Versagungsantragsteller.

Gegenstandswert (§ 28 Abs. 3 RVG): 4 000,00 EUR.

Keywords

insolvencyresidual debt dischargecost allocation

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Whether the debtor should be granted residual debt discharge.

The requested residual debt discharge is denied.

Allocation of the costs of the residual debt discharge proceeding.

The debtor bears the proceeding costs, but the denial applicant is primarily liable for court costs vis-à-vis the state.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.