Whether to grant the debtor residual debt discharge
Residual debt discharge is denied.
96 IN 215/06•Denial of residual debt discharge for the debtor
Denial of residual debt discharge for the debtorAI generated
96 IN 215/06Court of First InstanceJul 19, 2010Insolvency lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
In insolvency proceedings 96 IN 215/06, the Bonn Local Court denied the debtor’s requested residual debt discharge. The debtor was ordered to bear the costs of the discharge proceedings, with the applicant for denial bearing priority liability for court costs vis-à-vis the state treasury. The order states a value in dispute of up to EUR 5,000 for purposes of § 28(3) RVG.
Full text
Amtsgericht Bonn — 96 IN 215/06 — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-19
Aktenzeichen: 96 IN 215/06
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2010:0719.96IN215.06.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 96. Insolvenzabteilung
Normen: InsO §290 I Nr. 5; InsO §97
Tenor
wird dem Schuldner die beantragte Restschuldbefreiung versagt.
Die Kosten des Verfahrens über den Antrag auf Restschuldbefreiung trägt der Schuldner; für die Gerichtskosten haftet jedoch im Verhältnis zur Staatskasse vorrangig die Versagungsantragstellerin.
Gegenstandswert (§ 28 Abs. 3 RVG): bis 5.000 EUR.
Keywords
insolvencyresidual debt dischargecost allocation
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of the costs of the residual debt discharge application proceedings
The debtor bears the costs; the applicant for denial has priority liability for court costs vis-à-vis the treasury.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.