24 M 579/14•Debtor’s timely objection to the debtors’ register entry
24 M 579/14Court of First InstanceApr 16, 2014Debt enforcement and bankruptcy lawGranted
Extracted by Omnilex
The debtor objected on 20 February 2014 to the bailiff’s order of 9 February 2014 directing entry in the debtors’ register. The court upheld the objection and set aside the entry order. It stated that an entry impediment exists where, within the two-week period under ZPO § 882d, the debtor proves that the creditor has been satisfied or that an installment agreement has since been reached. Because no entry would now take place, the interim suspension ordered on 24 February 2014 became moot.
ZPO § 882d; impediments to entry in the debtors’ register: An impediment to entry must be taken into account where, within the statutory two-week period, the debtor proves that the creditor has been satisfied or that the parties have meanwhile concluded an installment-payment agreement. Such circumstances therefore prevent the entry order from taking effect when established within that period.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-04-16
Aktenzeichen: 24 M 579/14
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2014:0416.24M579.14.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 24. Zwangsvollstreckungsabteilung
Normen: ZPO § 882d
Zu berücksichtigende Eintragungshindernisse liegen auch dann vor, wenn der Schuldner noch innerhalb der 2-Wochen-Frist des § 882d ZPO den Nachweis erbringt, dass der Gläubiger befriedigt ist oder zwischenzeitlich eine Ratenzahlungsvereinbarung getroffen wurde
wird aufgrund des Widerspruchs des Schuldners vom 20.02.14 die Eintragungsanordnung des Obergerichtsvollziehers N vom 09.02.14 - DR II 31/14 - aufgehoben.
Die einstweilige Aussetzung der Eintragung vom 24.02.14 ist damit erledigt, da nun keine Eintragung mehr erfolgt.
Whether the order for entry in the debtors’ register should be set aside following the debtor’s objection.
An entry impediment exists if, within the two-week period under ZPO § 882d, the debtor proves that the creditor has been satisfied or that an installment agreement has since been made.
The court set aside the entry order on the debtor’s objection. The decision’s stated legal principle recognizes timely proof of satisfaction or a subsequent installment agreement as an impediment to entry.
Whether the interim suspension of entry remains effective after the entry order is set aside.
The interim suspension became moot because no entry will now be made.
Setting aside the entry order removed the basis for any further entry.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.