Whether the accused was guilty of two counts of fraud, including one count in concurrence with document forgery.
The accused was guilty of two counts of fraud; one count was committed concurrently with document forgery.
3a Ds-81 Js 47/15-297/15•Conviction for fraud and document forgery with suspended aggregate sentence
Conviction for fraud and document forgery with suspended aggregate sentenceAI generated
3a Ds-81 Js 47/15-297/15Court of First InstanceJun 28, 2016Criminal lawConvicted
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The District Court of Coesfeld convicted the accused of two counts of fraud, one committed concurrently with document forgery. It imposed an aggregate custodial sentence of one year and four months, incorporating a sentence from an earlier judgment of the same court. The execution of the aggregate sentence was suspended on probation. The accused was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings and his necessary expenses.
Omnilex headnote AI generated
Sections 263 and 267 of the German Criminal Code govern fraud and document forgery; sections 52 and 53 govern concurrence and multiple offenses, while sections 55 and 56 govern aggregate sentencing and suspension of sentence. Where a new sentence is imposed after an earlier conviction has become final but before that sentence has been fully served, the court must consider the requirements for forming an aggregate sentence under section 55. Suspension of execution is determined under section 56. The judgment applies these provisions to fraud committed on two occasions, one in concurrence with document forgery, and imposes a suspended aggregate custodial sentence.
Full text
Amtsgericht Coesfeld — 3a Ds-81 Js 47/15-297/15 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-28
Aktenzeichen: 3a Ds-81 Js 47/15-297/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGCOE1:2016:0628.3A.DS81JS47.15.29.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Amtsgericht
Normen: StGB §§ 263 I, III, 267, 52, 53, 55, 56
Tenor
Der Angeklagte wird wegen Betruges in zwei Fällen, davon in einem Fall in Tateinheit mit Urkundenfälschung, unter Einbeziehung der Strafe aus dem Urteil des Amtsgerichts Coesfeld vom 00.00.2000 (# a Ds – ## Js ####/## - ###/##) zu einer Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 4 Monaten verurteilt.
Die Vollstreckung der Strafe wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.
Der Angeklagte trägt die Kosten des Verfahrens sowie seine notwendigen Auslagen.
Angewandte Vorschriften:
§§ 263 I, III, 267, 52, 53, 55, 56 StGB
Keywords
frauddocument forgeryconcurrence of offensesaggregate sentencesuspended sentenceprobation
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
What aggregate sentence should be imposed, including the sentence from the earlier judgment, and whether its execution should be suspended.
An aggregate custodial sentence of one year and four months was imposed, with execution suspended on probation.
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings and necessary expenses.
The accused must bear the costs of the proceedings and his necessary expenses.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.