The plaintiff’s claim
The claim was dismissed.
3 C 116/14•Dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim and allocation of costs
Dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim and allocation of costsAI generated
3 C 116/14Court of First InstanceFeb 26, 2015Civil lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The District Court of Dülmen dismissed the plaintiff’s claim and ordered her to bear the costs of the proceedings. The judgment is provisionally enforceable. The plaintiff may prevent enforcement by providing security equal to 110% of the amount enforceable under the judgment, unless the defendant first provides security in the same amount. The excerpt does not identify the underlying claim or give reasons for the dismissal.
Full text
Amtsgericht Dülmen — 3 C 116/14 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-02-26
Aktenzeichen: 3 C 116/14
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGCOE2:2015:0226.3C116.14.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Einzelrichter
Tenor
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits werden der Klägerin auferlegt.
Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Die Klägerin kann die Vollstreckung durch die Gegenseite durch Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 110 % des aufgrund des Urteils vollstreckbaren Betrages abwenden, wenn nicht der Beklagte vor der Vollstreckung Sicherheit in gleicher Höhe leistet.
Keywords
claim dismissalcostsprovisional enforceability
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of the costs of the proceedings
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the proceedings.
Provisional enforceability and security against enforcement
The judgment is provisionally enforceable; the plaintiff may avert enforcement by providing security equal to 110% of the enforceable amount unless the defendant provides security in the same amount before enforcement.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.