The plaintiffs’ claim.
The claim was dismissed.
31 C 13834/99•Claim dismissed; litigation costs allocated between two plaintiffs
Claim dismissed; litigation costs allocated between two plaintiffsAI generated
31 C 13834/99Court of First InstanceDec 10, 1999Civil lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
Following an oral hearing on 29 October 1999, Düsseldorf District Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim. It allocated litigation costs by time period: the first plaintiff was ordered to bear costs incurred through 23 October 1999, and the second plaintiff costs incurred after that date. The judgment was declared provisionally enforceable. The court omitted the statement of facts under section 313a(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, so the decision text provides no further factual or merits reasoning.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 31 C 13834/99 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 1999-12-10
Aktenzeichen: 31 C 13834/99
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:1999:1210.31C13834.99.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Richter
Tenor
hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
auf die mündliche Verhandlung vom 29. Oktober 1999
durch den Richter am Amtsgericht X
für R e c h t erkannt:
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die bis zum 23. Oktober 1999 entstandenen Ko-
sten des Rechtsstreits hat die Klägerin zu 1.
zu tragen, die danach entstandenen Kosten des
Rechtsstreits hat der Kläger zu 2. zu tragen.
Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Die Darstellung des Tatbestandes entfällt gemäß § 313 a
Abs. 1 ZPO.
Keywords
civil claimcost allocationprovisional enforcement
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of litigation costs incurred through 23 October 1999 and thereafter.
The first plaintiff bears costs incurred through 23 October 1999; the second plaintiff bears costs incurred after that date.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.