Whether the debtor should be granted the requested discharge of residual debt.
The debtor is denied discharge of residual debt.
500 IN 292/02•Denial of the debtor’s application for debt discharge
Denial of the debtor’s application for debt dischargeAI generated
500 IN 292/02Court of First InstanceJun 12, 2006Insolvency lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
In the debtor’s insolvency proceedings, an additional participant sought denial of the debtor’s requested discharge of residual debt. The Local Court Düsseldorf granted that request and denied discharge. It ordered the debtor to bear the costs of the discharge proceedings, while providing that the discharge-objection applicant is liable for the court costs in priority as against the State Treasury. The decision gives no further facts or reasons.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 500 IN 292/02 — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-06-12
Aktenzeichen: 500 IN 292/02
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2006:0612.500IN292.02.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 500. Abteilung des Amtsgerichts
Tenor
In dem Insolvenzverfahren über das Vermögen
des xxxxxxxxx
zusätzlich beteiligt:
xxxxxxxxxxxx
als Versagungsantragsteller,
wird dem Schuldner die beantragte Restschuldbefreiung versagt.
Die Kosten des Verfahrens über den Antrag auf Restschuldbefreiung trägt der Schuldner; für die Gerichtskosten haftet jedoch im Verhältnis zur Staatskasse vorrangig der Versagungsantragsteller.
Keywords
insolvencydischarge of residual debtprocedural costs
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Allocation of the costs of the discharge proceedings.
The debtor bears the costs; as against the State Treasury, the discharge-objection applicant is liable for court costs in priority.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.