Correction of the wording of a judgment’s reasons

25 C 1317/06Court of First InstanceSep 4, 2006Civil lawModified

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

Düsseldorf Local Court corrected the reasons of its reserved judgment dated 12 July 2006. The corrected passage states that extraordinary termination was not an option in the case, except in connection with the alleged fraudulent conduct of the plaintiff’s employee on 15 February 2005. The order changes the wording of the judgment’s reasons; it does not set out any further disposition.

Full text

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 25 C 1317/06 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-09-04

Aktenzeichen: 25 C 1317/06

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2006:0904.25C1317.06.00

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Richterin am Amtsgericht

Tenor

Wird das Vorbehaltsurteil vom 12.07. 2006 dahin berichtigt, dass die Entscheidungsgründe Seite 7 im letzten Absatz erster Halbsatz nunmehr wie folgt lauten:

“Eine außerordentliche Kündigung kommt vorliegend mit Ausnahme des behaupteten arglistigen Verhaltens des Mitarbeiters der Klägerin am 15.02.2005 ebenfalls nicht in Betracht,....“

Keywords

judgment correctionextraordinary termination

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Correction of the wording in the reasons of the 12 July 2006 reserved judgment.

The relevant sentence was corrected to state that extraordinary termination was not an option, except in relation to the alleged fraudulent conduct of the plaintiff’s employee on 15 February 2005.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.