Whether the bailiff's assessment of fees under KV 207 and KV 261 GvKostG should be set aside on the creditor side's reminder.
The reminder was rejected at the creditor side's expense.
668 M 271/16•Creditor's challenge to bailiff fees
Creditor's challenge to bailiff feesAI generated
668 M 271/16Court of First InstanceFeb 22, 2016Debt enforcement and bankruptcy lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The creditor side filed a reminder challenging bailiff Saßen's assessment of fees under KV 207 and KV 261 of the Bailiff Costs Act, dated 16 December 2015. The District Court Düsseldorf rejected the reminder at the creditor side's expense. The court also permitted an appeal.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 668 M 271/16 — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-02-22
Aktenzeichen: 668 M 271/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2016:0222.668M271.16.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 668
Tenor
wird die Erinnerung der Gläubigerseite gegen den Kostenansatz des Gerichtsvollziehers Saßen vom 16.12.2015 betreffend den Ansatz der Gebühren KV 207 und KV 261 GvKostG auf deren Kosten zurückgewiesen.
Das Gericht lässt die Beschwerde zu.
Keywords
bailiff feescost assessmentreminderdebt enforcement
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Whether an appeal from the ruling should be permitted.
The court permitted an appeal.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.