Whether the accused was guilty of sexual coercion.
The accused was guilty of sexual coercion.
135 Ls-70 Js 284/16-36/16•Sexual coercion, suspended imprisonment, and lifting of the arrest warrant
Sexual coercion, suspended imprisonment, and lifting of the arrest warrantAI generated
135 Ls-70 Js 284/16-36/16Court of First InstanceJun 6, 2016Criminal lawOther
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
Düsseldorf District Court found B guilty of sexual coercion under § 177(1) StGB and sentenced him to one year and eight months’ imprisonment. It suspended execution of the sentence on probation under § 56(1) and (2) StGB. B was ordered to bear the proceedings’ costs and his own necessary expenses. The court also lifted its arrest warrant of 7 January 2016, while suspending implementation of that lifting.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 135 Ls-70 Js 284/16-36/16 — Urteil
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-06
Aktenzeichen: 135 Ls-70 Js 284/16-36/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2016:0606.135LS70JS284.16.3.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: Abteilung 135
Tenor
Der Angeklagte B ist der sexuellen Nötigung schuldig.
Er wird zu einer Freiheitsstrafe von einem Jahr und acht Monaten verurteilt, deren Vollstreckung zur Bewährung ausgesetzt wird.
Die Kosten des Verfahrens sowie seine eigenen notwendigen Auslagen trägt der Angeklagte.
Der Haftbefehl des Amtsgerichts Düsseldorf vom 07.01.2016, 135 Gs 8/16, wird aufgehoben. Die Vollziehung der Aufhebung des Haftbefehls wird ausgesetzt.
Angewendete Vorschriften
§§ 177 Abs. 1, 56 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 StGB
Keywords
sexual coercionsuspended sentenceprobationarrest warrantcosts
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
What sentence should be imposed and whether its execution should be suspended.
A prison sentence of one year and eight months was imposed, with execution suspended on probation.
Allocation of the proceedings’ costs and the accused’s necessary expenses.
The accused must bear the costs of the proceedings and his own necessary expenses.
Disposition of the arrest warrant issued by Düsseldorf District Court on 7 January 2016.
The arrest warrant was lifted, but implementation of the lifting was suspended.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.