666 M 1273/17•Creditor’s complaint concerning delivery of a prior asset disclosure
666 M 1273/17Court of First InstanceSep 11, 2017Debt enforcement and bankruptcy lawOther
Extracted by Omnilex
The creditor appealed a ruling dated 7 July 2017 in proceedings concerning a bailiff’s handling of a request for an asset disclosure. The Düsseldorf Local Court declined to grant relief on the complaint and referred the matter to the competent complaint chamber of the Düsseldorf Regional Court for further decision. The decision’s stated legal proposition is that, before the Federal Court of Justice ruling of 27 October 2016, sending a creditor a copy of an asset disclosure already given within the previous two years, contrary to the creditor’s stated wishes, did not constitute incorrect official handling by the bailiff under section 7(1) GvKostG.
GvKostG Art. 7(1); delivery to a creditor of a copy of an asset disclosure already made within the preceding two years, despite the creditor’s expressed wish to the contrary, did not, before the Federal Court of Justice’s decision of 27 October 2016 (I ZB 21/16), constitute incorrect official handling by the bailiff within the meaning of section 7(1) GvKostG. The proposition is temporally limited to the period before that decision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-09-11
Aktenzeichen: 666 M 1273/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2017:0911.666M1273.17.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Abteilung 666
Normen: GvKostG § 7 Abs. 1; GvKostG KV 261 KV 604; ZPO § 802 c und d
Bis zur Entscheidung des BGH vom 27.10.2016 - I ZB 21/16 stellt es keine unrichtige Sachbehandlung durch den Gerichtsvollzieher im Sinne des § 7 Abs. 1 GvKostG dar, wenn er dem Gläubiger im Verfahren auf Abgabe der Vermögensauskunft entgegen dessen erklärten Wunsch einen Abdruck einer bereits in den letzten zwei Jahren abgegebenen Vermögensauskunft zuleitet.
wird der Beschwerde der/des Gläubigers/in vom 03.08.2017 gegen den Beschluss vom 07.07.2017 nicht abgeholfen und die Sache der zuständigen Beschwerdekammer beim Landgericht Düsseldorf zur weiteren Entscheidung vorgelegt.
Whether the Local Court should grant the creditor’s complaint against the 7 July 2017 ruling or refer it to the complaint chamber.
The Local Court did not grant the complaint and referred the matter to the competent complaint chamber.
The decision states that the complaint was not remedied and was therefore submitted for further decision.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.