Whether the child’s father’s complaint alleging procedural delay should be upheld.
The complaint was unfounded; no further measures were required.
254 F 57/15•Dismissal of a father’s complaint alleging procedural delay
Dismissal of a father’s complaint alleging procedural delayAI generated
254 F 57/15Court of First InstanceDec 1, 2017Family lawDismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
Omnilex summary AI generated
The child’s father filed an acceleration complaint on 22 November 2017 in family proceedings before the Düsseldorf Local Court. On 1 December 2017, a single judge dismissed the complaint as unfounded and held that no further measures were necessary.
Full text
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 254 F 57/15 — Beschluss
Entscheidungsdatum: 2017-12-01
Aktenzeichen: 254 F 57/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2017:1201.254F57.15.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Abteilung 254
Tenor
hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
am 01.12.2017
durch die Richterin am Amtsgericht Q
beschlossen:
Die Beschleunigungsrüge des Kindesvaters vom 22.11.2017 wird als unbegründet zurückgewiesen. Weitere Maßnahmen sind nicht zu ergreifen.
Keywords
family proceedingsprocedural delayacceleration complaint
Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.