Revision dismissed in employer-loan tariff dispute

BAG 6 AZR 595/07Bag / Division 6Jan 21, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In a revision proceedings concerning an employer loan and a tariff limitation period, the Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because the case was linked to a parallel lead case. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel lead case, the appellate court may issue a judgment without factual findings or reasons. In revision, such a judgment is reviewed only within the scope allowed by the procedural posture; where no reversible error is established, the revision is to be dismissed. The waiver in relation to a leading parallel case does not by itself preclude a valid judgment without reasons (consid. not stated).

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 595/07, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-21

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 595/07

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 23. Mai 2006, Az: 16/4 Ca 9661/05, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. März 2007, Az: 17 Sa 1790/06, Urteilnachgehend BVerfG, 26. April 2010, Az: 1 BvR 907/10, Nichtannahmebeschluss

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Titelzeile

Arbeitgeberdarlehen - Tarifliche Ausschlussfrist - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. März 2007 - 17 Sa 1790/06 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 556/07 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
KapitzaKoch

Keywords

revisionemployer loantariff limitation periodwaiver of reasonsparallel casecosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court issued the judgment without facts or reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel lead case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs followed the dismissal of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.