The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 6 AZR 594/07•Employer loan and contractual limitation period in labor case
BAG 6 AZR 594/07Bag / Division 6Jan 21, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the employee's revision against the Hessian Regional Labour Court in a dispute concerning an employer loan and a contractual limitation period. The parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel lead case. The court therefore issued only the operative part: the revision was rejected and the employee had to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties, in view of a leading parallel case, waive statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide by judgment without such sections. The procedural economy of a shortened judgment form does not affect the dispositive review of the revision; if the revision is unfounded, it is to be dismissed and the unsuccessful appellant bears the revision costs.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-21
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 594/07
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 23. Mai 2006, Az: 16/4 Ca 9664/05, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. März 2007, Az: 17 Sa 1791/06, Urteilnachgehend BVerfG, 26. April 2010, Az: 1 BvR 909/10, Nichtannahmebeschluss
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Arbeitgeberdarlehen - Tarifliche Ausschlussfrist - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. März 2007 - 17 Sa 1791/06 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 556/07 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO).
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kapitza | Koch |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the employee's revision against the Hessian Regional Labour Court judgment was well founded
The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.
The decision contains only the dispositive ruling; the parties waived statement of facts and reasons in view of the lead parallel case.
Allocation of revision costs
The employee had to bear the costs of the revision.
Costs followed the unsuccessful revision.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.