Revision dismissed in employment termination case

BAG 2 AZR 723/08Bag / Division 2Feb 23, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labour Court. The decision contains no statement of facts or reasons because the court applied Section 313a(1) ZPO. The only operative consequence stated is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; when the court dispenses with a statement of facts and reasons, the judgment contains only the dispositive ruling. In such a case, the operative part may simply reject the revision and allocate costs according to the unsuccessful outcome; no further substantive reasoning is set out in the text.

Full text

BAG — 2 AZR 723/08, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-23

Aktenzeichen: 2 AZR 723/08

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 23. November 2007, Az: 1 Ca 539/06, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 9. Juli 2008, Az: 13 Sa 5/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Mannheim - vom 9. Juli 2008 - 13 Sa 5/08 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Von der Darstellung des Tatbestandes und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO).

KreftBergerSchmitz-Scholemann
K. SchierleDr. Roeckl

Keywords

revisioncoststermination disputejudgment without reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court dispensed with a statement of facts and reasons pursuant to Section 313a(1) ZPO, so no substantive reasoning is given in the text provided.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The revision was unsuccessful, so costs followed the outcome.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.