The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed; plaintiff bears costs in labor dispute

BAG 5 AZR 334/10Bag / Division 5Feb 23, 2011Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian State Labor Court in an employment case. The court left the lower-court decision intact and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision. The decision was rendered without a statement of facts or reasons pursuant to § 313a ZPO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; when the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may issue a shortened judgment. A revision that is not successful is dismissed; the losing appellant bears the costs of the revision proceedings. The judgment contains no further substantive review where the disposition is limited to rejection of the revision and cost allocation.

Full text

BAG — 5 AZR 334/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-02-23

Aktenzeichen: 5 AZR 334/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 20. August 2009, Az: 2 Ca 82/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 15. März 2010, Az: 17/7 Sa 1782/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 15. März 2010 - 17/7 Sa 1782/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

Müller-GlögeLauxBiebl
KesselZoller

Keywords

revisioncostsemployment disputeshort judgmentwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian State Labor Court judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court rejected the revision without altering the lower-court judgment.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

Because the revision was dismissed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.