The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 8 AZR 663/09•Revision dismissed in employment dispute; plaintiff bears costs
BAG 8 AZR 663/09Bag / Division 8Apr 7, 2011Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hamburg Landesarbeitsgericht. The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under the procedural provisions cited in the heading. The only operative consequences are dismissal of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the plaintiff.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in revision proceedings, the Federal Labour Court may issue a shortened judgment without full reasoning; the appeal is dismissed if the court upholds the lower-court result. The dispositive cost order follows the outcome of the revision and may place the costs on the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-04-07
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 663/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hamburg, 23. Januar 2008, Az: 26 Ca 295/07, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg, 17. Juni 2009, Az: 3 Sa 8/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Hamburg vom 17. Juni 2009 - 3 Sa 8/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf die Entscheidung des Senats vom 22. Oktober 2009 - 8 AZR 286/08 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warnke | Mallmann |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the LAG Hamburg judgment should be allowed
The revision was dismissed.
The dispositive part states that the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hamburg Regional Labour Court is rejected; no further reasons are set out because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons.
Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
The tenor expressly assigns the costs of the revision to the plaintiff.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.