The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed; revision costs borne by defendant

BAG 6 AZR 591/10Bag / Division 6Feb 16, 2012Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Lower Labour Court of Lower Saxony. The parties waived findings of fact and reasons because the case was handled together with the leading case 6 AZR 573/10. The court ordered that the defendant bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; when the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a leading case, the judgment may be rendered in abbreviated form. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 591/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-02-16

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 591/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hannover, 24. November 2009, Az: 13 Ca 19/09, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 23. August 2010, Az: 9 Sa 1613/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 23. August 2010 - 9 Sa 1613/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Verfahren - 6 AZR 573/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
SchäferkordB. Bender

Keywords

revisioncostsdismissallabour courtwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Lower Labour Court should be upheld or dismissed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The decision refers to the leading case 6 AZR 573/10 and, by agreement of the parties, omits findings and reasons under the applicable procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the defendant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.