Revision dismissed in employment case

BAG 4 AZR 285/10Bag / Division 4Mar 21, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the Hamburg Labour Court of Appeal judgment. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them in light of a parallel proceeding. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the appellate court may decide without setting them out. In revision proceedings, dismissal of the appeal entails allocation of the costs to the unsuccessful party. The waiver is permissible in parallel-case constellations and does not affect the operative part of the judgment.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 285/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-03-21

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 285/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hamburg, 3. September 2009, Az: 17 Ca 103/09, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamburg, 16. März 2010, Az: 2 Sa 200/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Hamburg vom 16. März 2010 - 2 Sa 200/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 278/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

BeplerCreutzfeldtWinter
LippokPieper

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the Hamburg LAG judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains only the dispositive part; no further reasons were set out because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons due to a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the defendant was ordered to bear the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.