The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 8 AZR 437/11•Revision dismissed in labor law dispute
BAG 8 AZR 437/11Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court, 8th Senate, dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht. No substantive reasons were set out because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons. The only express consequence was that the plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the appellate court may render a shortened judgment form. If the revision is dismissed, the revision costs are borne by the unsuccessful revising party.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 437/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 8. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 2970/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 328/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. November 2010 - 9 Sa 328/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Wroblewski |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labor judgment was successful
The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.
The Federal Labor Court rejected the revision and, as noted, the parties had waived statement of facts and reasons.
Allocation of costs of the revision
The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the revision costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.