The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed; plaintiff bears costs

BAG 10 AZR 824/11Bag / Division 10Oct 17, 2012Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Landesarbeitsgericht. The court record states that the parties waived the presentation of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO, so the decision contains no substantive reasoning. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons; revision dismissed. Where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision without setting out the factual and legal grounds in detail. If the revision is unfounded, it is dismissed and the costs of the revision proceedings are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 10 AZR 824/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-10-17

Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 824/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 29. September 2010, Az: 14 Ca 1699/10, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 29. Juni 2011, Az: 8 Sa 1854/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 10. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 29. Juni 2011 - 8 Sa 1854/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf die Darstellung von Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründen verzichtet.

MikoschSchmitz-ScholemannMestwerdt
BeckKiel

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabor lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains no factual or legal reasoning because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.