Revision dismissed in labor appeal; costs borne by defendant

BAG 4 AZR 83/11Bag / Division 4Feb 27, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The decision was rendered without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them in light of the leading parallel case 4 AZR 78/11. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in a revision decision referring to a leading parallel case. Where the parties have expressly waived the drafting of findings of fact and reasons because the matter is governed by a parallel leading case, the Federal Labor Court may render its judgment accordingly without further reasoning. The unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 83/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-02-27

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 83/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 12. Mai 2010, Az: 4 Ca 120/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 30. Dezember 2010, Az: 3 Sa 1132/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 30. Dezember 2010 - 3 Sa 1132/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 78/11 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtTreber
StedingRupprecht

Keywords

revisionlabor lawparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonscosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment should be upheld.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in view of the leading parallel case; no basis for overturning the lower judgment was shown.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful appellant, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.