Revision upheld; employer’s appeal dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 6 AZR 835/11Bag / Division 6May 16, 2013Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this labor-law revision, the Federal Labour Court set aside the judgment of the Saxon Regional Labour Court and rejected the defendant’s appeal against the Bautzen Labour Court judgment. The decision was issued without findings of fact or reasons because the parties had waived them under Section 313a ZPO. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision by operative part only. If the revision is upheld, the appellate judgment is set aside and, where appropriate, the opponent’s appeal against the first-instance judgment is dismissed; the costs of the appeal and revision may be imposed on the losing party by the operative part alone.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 835/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-05-16

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 835/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Bautzen, 20. Oktober 2010, Az: 1 Ca 1065/10, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 21. September 2011, Az: 2 Sa 715/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 21. September 2011 - 2 Sa 715/10 - aufgehoben.

  2. Die Berufung der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Bautzen vom 20. Oktober 2010 - 1 Ca 1065/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  3. Die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision hat die Beklagte zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
M. JostesLauth

Keywords

revisionappealcostswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the appellate judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision succeeded; the appellate judgment was set aside.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court upheld the plaintiff’s challenge without setting out reasons, as the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons.

Key legal question

Whether the defendant’s appeal against the first-instance judgment was well-founded.

Extracted holding

The defendant’s appeal was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The appellate judgment was overturned, and the first-instance judgment remained in force.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of appeal and revision.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the appeal and the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The operative part expressly places the costs on the defendant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.