The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law parallel-proceedings case

BAG 4 AZR 98/12Bag / Division 4Sep 25, 2013Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the defendant’s revision against the Saarland Labor Court judgment. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons because the case was linked to the parallel lead proceeding 4 AZR 99/12. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties, in view of a parallel lead case, waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may decide without reasons; if the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the costs are borne by the losing appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 98/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-09-25

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 98/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Saarbrücken, 28. Juni 2011, Az: 4 Ca 1071/10, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Saarland, 23. November 2011, Az: 2 Sa 78/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Saarland vom 23. November 2011 - 2 Sa 78/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 99/12 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtWinter
SchuldtPieper

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the Saarland Labor Court judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

No reasons were stated because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons in view of the parallel lead proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The defendant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The losing appellant bears the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.