Revision dismissed; defendant state bears revision costs

BAG 9 AZR 754/12Bag / Division 9Oct 15, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the defendant state's revision against the judgment of the LAG Berlin-Brandenburg. The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons pursuant to section 313a(1) ZPO. The only express dispositive consequence, besides dismissal of the revision, is that the defendant state must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons: where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision by judgment without a full written reasoning. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the appellant bears the costs of the revision. The abbreviated form of judgment does not alter the binding force of the appellate judgment; it merely affects the scope of the written reasons (consid. not specified).

Full text

BAG — 9 AZR 754/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15

Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 754/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 15. Dezember 2011, Az: 59 Ca 10955/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 22. Juni 2012, Az: 8 Sa 362/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des beklagten Landes gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 22. Juni 2012 - 8 Sa 362/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

BrühlerKrasshöferKlose
KranzuschM. Lücke

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabour lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant state's revision against the LAG Berlin-Brandenburg judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; no further factual or legal reasoning is available because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under section 313a(1) ZPO.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The defendant state must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the costs were imposed on the appellant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.