The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
BAG 9 AZR 837/12•Recognition of additional service period in employment dispute
BAG 9 AZR 837/12Bag / Division 9Oct 15, 2013Partially Granted
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court partly upheld the plaintiff's revision in a dispute against the defendant state. It set aside the judgment of the Berlin-Brandenburg Higher Labour Court in part and amended the Berlin Labour Court judgment so that the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 must also be taken into account. The defendant's revision was dismissed. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the litigation.
Employment law; recognition of service periods in a revision proceeding; if the appellate court's operative part is only partly incorrect, the Federal Labour Court may set it aside in part and amend the first-instance judgment accordingly. Where the plaintiff's appeal succeeds to that extent, the defendant bears the costs of the proceedings (cf. operative part; parties waived findings of fact and reasons under § 313a(1) ZPO).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15
Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 837/12
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 26. Januar 2012, Az: 58 Ca 15278/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 9. August 2012, Az: 25 Sa 332/12 und 25 Sa 404/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 9. Senat
Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 9. August 2012 - 25 Sa 332/12 und 25 Sa 404/12 - unter Zurück-weisung der Revision des beklagten Landes teilweise aufgehoben.
Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Berlin vom 26. Januar 2012 - 58 Ca 15278/11 - mit der Maßgabe abgeändert, dass auch die Zeit vom 1. Januar 2004 bis zum 30. Juni 2011 zu berücksichtigen ist.
Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .
| Brühler | Krasshöfer | Klose | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kranzusch | M. Lücke |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the employment period from 2004-01-01 to 2011-06-30 had to be taken into account.
Yes. The appellate judgment was partially set aside and the first-instance judgment was amended so that this period must also be considered.
The court accepted the plaintiff's revision and adjusted the operative part accordingly, leaving the defendant's revision unsuccessful.
Allocation of costs of the litigation.
The defendant bears the costs.
As a consequence of the partial success of the plaintiff's revision and appeal, the court ordered the defendant to pay the costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.