Recognition of service period from 2004 to 2011

BAG 9 AZR 889/12Bag / Division 9Oct 15, 2013Partially Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this employment dispute, the Federal Labour Court partially upheld the claimant's revision. It set aside the regional labour court's judgment in part and amended the labour court judgment so that the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 must also be taken into account. The defendant state was ordered to bear the costs of the litigation. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons; where the parties waive the factual and reasoning sections, the court may issue a shortened judgment. If the revision is partially successful, the appellate judgment is to be set aside to the corresponding extent and the first-instance judgment amended accordingly; the costs follow the outcome of the proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 9 AZR 889/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-15

Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 889/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 26. Januar 2012, Az: 33 Ca 15490/11, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 27. Juni 2012, Az: 24 Sa 328/12 und 24 Sa 403/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 27. Juni 2012 - 24 Sa 328/12 und 24 Sa 403/12 - unter Zurück-weisung der Revision des beklagten Landes teilweise aufgehoben.

  2. Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Berlin vom 26. Januar 2012 - 33 Ca 15490/11 - mit der Maßgabe abgeändert, dass auch die Zeit vom 1. Januar 2004 bis zum 30. Juni 2011 zu berücksichtigen ist.

  3. Das beklagte Land hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

BrühlerKrasshöferKlose
KranzuschM. Lücke

Keywords

employment disputeservice periodappealrevisioncostsshortened judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2011 had to be taken into account.

Extracted holding

Yes. The lower-court judgment was amended so that this period must also be considered.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court partially set aside the appellate judgment and granted the claimant's revision on this point.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.