The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor law dispute

BAG 4 AZR 160/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The decision contains no substantive reasons because the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in revision proceedings. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the decision, the court may render a judgment without detailed reasoning if the statutory prerequisites are met, in particular when reference to a parallel proceeding renders a full written justification unnecessary (consid. in the tenor).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 160/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 160/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 233/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 317/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 317/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedinglabour courtappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

No detailed reasons were set out in the judgment; the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.