The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in collective labor pay dispute

BAG 4 AZR 181/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The decision was rendered without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties waived them in light of a parallel case. The plaintiff, as the unsuccessful revising party, was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case. Where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons, the appellate court may decide without elaborating them if the statutory prerequisites are met. A revision that does not succeed is to be dismissed; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 181/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 181/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 159/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 338/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 338/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiverlabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should be upheld

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The parties had waived factual and legal reasoning in light of a parallel proceeding, and the Federal Labor Court rejected the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revising party, the plaintiff bears the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.