Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 172/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court (4th Senate) decided the claimant's revision against the Hessian State Labor Court judgment. The court dismissed the revision and ordered the claimant to bear the costs of the revision. The decision was issued without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in light of a parallel proceeding.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in labor-law revision proceedings due to a parallel case. Where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may issue a shortened judgment. If the revision is dismissed, the costs of the revision are to be borne by the unsuccessful appellant. The judgment contains no substantive elaboration beyond the operative part and the reference to the waiver in the parallel proceeding.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 172/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 172/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 185/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 329/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 329/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedinglabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian State Labor Court judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court dismissed the revision. The document contains only the operative part and notes that the parties waived factual findings and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the claimant was ordered to pay the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.