The AI workspace for legal professionals

  • Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
  • Document automation
  • Matter management
  • Hosted in the EU and Switzerland

Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)

Try for freeBook a demo

Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 175/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The court noted that, in light of the parallel proceeding 4 AZR 50/13, the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in parallel proceedings: Where the parties, with reference to a parallel case, waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment, the Federal Labor Court may render a shortened judgment without detailed reasoning. The revision is dismissed if no ground for interference is established; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision (consid. 1).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 175/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 175/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 183/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 332/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 332/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG , § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostslabor lawparallel proceedingswaiverjudgment without reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court rejected the revision without setting out reasons because the parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons in view of the parallel case.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.